Publication Ethics

Ethical Guidelines for "Graduate Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Reports & Reviews (Grad. J. InteR3)"

Ethical guidelines are essential in maintaining the integrity, credibility, and trustworthiness of academic publications. The "Graduate Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Reports & Reviews (Grad. J. InteR3)" is taking care of it. These guidelines outline the responsibilities of various stakeholders involved in the publication process, including authors, reviewers, editorial board members, and journal office. By adhering to these guidelines, we ensure the quality, fairness, and transparency of the scholarly communication process.

I. Authors’ Responsibilities:

1. Originality:

   • Authors must ensure that their submissions are original works and have not been published elsewhere or submitted to other journals concurrently.
   • Proper citations and references should be provided for any previously published or ongoing work that has contributed to the submitted manuscript.

2. Accuracy and Integrity:

   • Authors are responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the content presented in their manuscripts.
   • Data and findings should be presented truthfully and without manipulation or fabrication.

3. Authorship:

   • All individuals who have made significant contributions to the research should be listed as authors.
   • Proper acknowledgment should be given to individuals who have contributed in a meaningful way but do not meet the criteria for authorship.

4. Conflict of Interest:

   • Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence the interpretation or perception of their research findings.
   • This includes financial interests, affiliations, or personal relationships that could be perceived as influencing the research process or outcomes.

2. Reviewers’ Responsibilities:

1. Objectivity:

   • Reviewers should conduct the peer review process objectively and without bias, focusing solely on the quality and validity of the research presented.
   • Personal or professional relationships with the authors should not influence the review process.

2. Timeliness:

   • Reviewers should adhere to the agreed-upon timeline for completing their reviews and providing feedback to the editorial team.
   • Prompt communication is essential in ensuring the efficiency of the peer review process.

3. Confidentiality:

   • Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the review process and refrain from disclosing any details or findings of the manuscript under review.
   • Manuscripts should not be shared with or discussed with others without explicit permission from the journal's editorial team.

3. Editorial Board Members’ Responsibilities:

1. Editorial Integrity:

   • Editorial board members are responsible for upholding the integrity and reputation of the journal.
   • Decisions regarding manuscript acceptance, rejection, or revision should be based on the quality, validity, and significance of the research presented.

2. Conflict of Interest:

   • Editorial board members should declare any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in the review and decision-making process.
   • Conflicts of interest should be disclosed transparently and addressed appropriately to ensure the fairness and impartiality of editorial decisions.

3. Editorial Policies:

   • Editorial board members should be familiar with and adhere to the journal's editorial policies, including guidelines for peer review, authorship, and ethical standards.
   • Any deviations from established policies should be justified and communicated transparently to authors and reviewers.

4. Responsibilities of the Journals Office:

1. Manuscript Handling:

   • The journal office is responsible for managing the submission and review process, ensuring that manuscripts are processed efficiently and in accordance with established timelines.
   • Communication with authors, reviewers, and editorial board members will be clear, courteous, and prompt.

2. Quality Assurance:

   • The journal office plays a key role in ensuring the quality and integrity of published content.
   • Manuscripts will be screened for plagiarism, adherence to ethical guidelines, and compliance with journal formatting requirements before being accepted for publication.

3. Transparency and Accountability:

   • The journal office will maintain transparent and accountable practices in all aspects of editorial and publication processes.
   • Policies, procedures, and decisions will be documented and accessible to all stakeholders, fostering trust and confidence in the journal's operations.

In conclusion, ethical guidelines serve as a cornerstone of academic publishing, promoting integrity, transparency, and fairness in the dissemination of research findings. Authors, reviewers, editorial board members, and journal offices all play crucial roles in upholding these standards and ensuring the credibility and trustworthiness of scholarly publications. The "Graduate Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Reports & Reviews (Grad. J. InteR3)" is also a part of it and will adhere all the guidelines recommended by the various agencies to maintain it. By adhering to these guidelines, we uphold the principles of academic integrity and advance knowledge in our respective fields.

These are a few highlights and not limited to publications ethics and best practices in publishing. 

References:

COPE Guidelines for reviewers

COPE Core practices

Best Practices in Publishing

ICMJE Recommendations