Numerical Simulation of Shell Model Single Particle Energy States using Matrix Numerov Method in Gnumeric Worksheet

Authors

  • Shikha Awasthi Department of Physical and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, HP-176215, Bharat(India)
  • Aditi Sharma Department of Physical and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, HP-176215, Bharat(India)
  • Swapna Gora Department of Physical and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, HP-176215, Bharat(India)
  • O. S. K. S. Sastri Department of Physical and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, HP-176215, Bharat(India)

Keywords:

Single particle energy states, matrix Numerov method, Gnumeric, doubly magic, Nuclear Shell Model

Abstract

Single particle energy states as described by the nuclear shell model are obtained for doubly magic nuclei using a Gnumeric worksheet environment. The Numerov method rephrased in matrix form is utilized to solve the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) within mean-field approximation, described by Woods-Saxon (WS) potential along with the spin-orbit term, to obtain the single-particle energies for both neutron and proton states. The WS model parameters are chosen from previous simulation results performed using matrix methods technique involving sine basis, where optimization was done w.r.t available experimental single-particle energies for 208Pb and 20Ca. In this paper, only the algorithm parameters, step size ‘h’ and matrix size ‘N’ are optimized to obtain the expected energy level sequence obtained using matrix methods. An attempt is made, by incorporating this tool within the framework of guided inquiry strategy (a constructivist approach to learning), to actively engage the students in assigning appropriate J π configurations for ground states of nuclei neighboring the doubly magic ones. It has been observed that the ground state configurations could be better predicted when energy level sequences are known for all nuclei as compared to what is usually obtained from that of 208Pb alone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Meyer, Am. J. Phys. 36, 250 (1968).

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1974490

R. D. Woods and D. S. Saxon, Phys. Rev. 95, 577 (1954).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.577

https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/7870779_B.SC.PROGRAM-PHYSICS.pdf.

S. K. Krane, Introductory Nuclear Physics (Jon Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988).

https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introductory+Nuclear+Physics%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9780471805533

S. N. Ghoshal, Nuclear Physics (S. Chand Publishing, 1997).

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=fkqHNMd_248C&printsec=copyright#v=onepage&q&f=false

S. S. M. Wong, Introductory Nuclear Physics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9783527617906

J. Bhagavathi, S. Gora, V.V.V. Satyanarayana, O.S.K.S. Sastri, and B.P. Ajith, Phys. Educ. 36, 1 (2020).

https://csparkresearch.in/assets/pdfs/gammaiapt.pdf

B.P. Jithin, V.V.V. Satyanarayana, S. Gora, O. S. K. S. Sastri and, B.P. Ajith, Phys. Educ. 35, 1 (2019).

https://csparkresearch.in/assets/pdfs/alpha2.pdf

S. Gora, B.P. Jithin, V.V.V. Satyanarayana, O.S.K.S. Sastri, and B.P. Ajith, Phys. Educ. 35, 1 (2019).

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Alpha-Spectrum-of-212-Bi-Source-Prepared-using-of-3-Gora-Jithin/a1998cfee897c57968e08be30a45396fae757e90

A. Sharma, S. Gora, J. Bhagavathi, and O.S.K. Sastri, Am. J. Phys. 88, 576 (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001041

O.S.K.S Sastri, Aditi Sharma, Jyoti Bhardwaj, Swapna Gora, Vandana Sharda and Jithin B.P, Phys. Educ., 1 (2019).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348555315_Numerical_Solution_of_Square

_Well_Potential_With_Matrix_Method_Using_Worksheets

A. Sharma and O.S.K.S. Sastri, Eur. J. Phys. 41, 055402 (2020).

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6404/ab988c/meta

O.S.K.S. Sastri, A. Sharma, S. Awasthi, A. Khachi, and L. Kumar, Phys. Educ. 36, 1 (2019).

http://www.physedu.in/pub/2020/PE20-09-673

M. Pillai, J. Goglio, and T.G. Walker, Am. J. Phys. 80, 1017 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4748813

N. Schwierz, I. Wiedenhover, and A. Volya, arXiv:0709.3525 [nucl-th] (2007).

https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3525

D. Hestenes, Am. J. Phys. 55, 440 (1987).

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15129

K.L.G. Heyde, The Nuclear Shell Model, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1994).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79052-2_4

A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, World Scientific, Singapore (1998).

https://doi.org/10.1142/3530

https://nukephysik101.wordpress.com/tag/runge-kutta/ for solving Woods-Saxon

potential using the Runge-Kutta method.

"Guided inquiry process".https://www.michiganseagrant.org/lessons/teacher-tools/guided-inquiry-process/

https://saivyasa.in/moodle/message/index.php?id=2

A.P. Arya, Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston (1966).

https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofnu0000arya

R. Casten and R.F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, (Oxford University Press on Demand, 2000.)

https://homel.vsb.cz/ãle02/Physics/RFCasten-NuclearStructureFromASimplePerspective.pdf

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Awasthi, S., Sharma, A., Gora, S., & Sastri, O. S. K. S. (2024). Numerical Simulation of Shell Model Single Particle Energy States using Matrix Numerov Method in Gnumeric Worksheet. Graduate Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Reports and Reviews , 1(02), 63–75. Retrieved from https://jpr.vyomhansjournals.com/index.php/gjir/article/view/13

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

URN

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.