An Intercomparison Exercise Between EGSnrc and MCNPX for Validation of New egs kerma User Code

Authors

  • L. F. Araujo Department of Nuclear Engineering - DEN, UFMG, BH 31270-901, MG, Brazil
  • C.V.G. Ferreira Department of Nuclear Engineering - DEN, UFMG, BH 31270-901, MG, Brazil
  • F.S.G. Silva Department of Nuclear Engineering - DEN, UFMG, BH 31270-901, MG, Brazil
  • L. Paixao Department of Anatomy and Image - FM, UFMG, BH 30130-100, MG, Brazil.
  • T.C.F. Fonseca Department of Nuclear Engineering - DEN, UFMG, BH 31270-901, MG, Brazil.

Keywords:

Computational Modelling, Monte Carlo Simulation, egs kerma, MCNPX, EGSnrc, TG 195

Abstract

Background: The “Case 1” exercise described in the TG report 195 of the American Association of Physicists in
Medicine was used. This exercise aims to verify the material attenuation of a filter of aluminum and the half and
quarter-value layer calculations.
Purpose: The objective of this work was to perform an intercom-parison exercise using two Monte Carlo codes,
MCNPX and EGSnrc, and its recently released egs kerma user code.
Method: A collimated X-ray source was considered for two mono-energetic (30 and 100 keV) and two X-ray spectra
(30 kVp Mo/Mo and 100 kVp W/Al) beams.
Results: The HVL and QVL results obtained using both MC codes were compared to the results provided by the TG
195. The average percentage deviations obtained between the results and the published by TG 195 were less than 1%
for both sources.
Conclusions: The results obtained between the MC codes were used to validate the newly released egs kerma user
code, which compared to cavity user code results have shown no differences.

Keywords: Computational Modelling, Monte Carlo Simulation, egs kerma, TG 195, EGSnrc, MCNPX.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D.W.O. Rogers. Physics in Medicine and Biology 51(13), 287 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/r17.

L. Paixão, B.M. Mendes, T.C.F. Fonseca. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences, 7(1) (2019).

T.C.F. Fonseca, et al. Physics in Medicine & Biology 59(22), 6811 (2014).

T.C.F. Fonseca, et al. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 117, 111 (2016).

T.C.F. Fonseca, et al., Radiation Physics and Chemistry 140, 386 (2017).

L. Del Lama, D.M. Cunha, M.E. Poletti. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.004.

I. Sechopoulos, E.S. Ali, et al. Medical physics 42(10),5679 (2015).

J.H. Hubbell, S.M. Seltzer. Technical report, National Inst. of Standards and Technology-PL, Gaithersburg, MD (United States). (1995).

I. Kawrakow, J.P. Seuntjens, D.W.Rogers, F.Tessier, B.R. Walters. The EGSnrc Code System: Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport, NRCC Report No. PIRS-701. (2013).

I. Kawrakow, J.P. Seuntjens, D.W. Rogers, F. Tessier, B.R. Walters. Report PIRS-898.https://nrccnrc.github.io/EGSnrc/doc/pirs898/egs-kerma.html(Accessed2020-08-12).

D. Pelowitz. MCNPX Users Manual Version 2.7.0, LA-CP-11-00438 edn. Los Alamos National Laboratory,(2011).

L. Waters, G. Mckinney, J. Durkee, M. Fensin, J. Hendricks, M. James, R. Johns, D. Pelowitz. The MCNPX Monte Carlo radiation transport code. AIP Conference Proceedings 896, 81 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2720459.

J.K. Shultis, R.E. Faw. AN MCNP PRIMER. Dept. of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, (2008).

I. Sechopoulos, D.W. Rogers, et al., Records: improved reporting of Monte Carlo radiation transport studies: report of the AAPM research committee Task Group 268. Medical Physics 45(1), 1–5 (2018).

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Araujo, L. F., Ferreira, C., Silva, F., Paixao, L., & Fonseca, T. (2023). An Intercomparison Exercise Between EGSnrc and MCNPX for Validation of New egs kerma User Code. Graduate Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Reports and Reviews , 1(1), 3–9. Retrieved from https://jpr.vyomhansjournals.com/index.php/gjir/article/view/14

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories